|
|
|
|
ASCO 2010 Ovarian Advances
Dr. Susan Ellard, FRCPC, BC Cancer Agency, Southern Interior
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) 2010 included a number of very interesting presentations on new drug therapy approaches for ovarian cancer. Hopefully, many of these new developments and explorations will soon lead to a better chance of cure of advanced ovarian cancer in the first place or at least to longer and better survival with ovarian cancer. Change of this type can't come soon enough! Researchers and other cancer patients and their families, owe a tremendous debt of gratitude to the courageous people who take part in clinical studies, to help us advance our knowledge of how to fight these diseases more successfully.
Chemotherapy plus Anti-Angiogenic Therapy
At one of the ASCO meeting plenary session, results of a major American study were reported. This compared 3 treatment plans for women just diagnosed with ovary cancer: standard chemotherapy with placebo (inactive drug look-alike), as compared to chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab (BEV) given with the chemotherapy, or given with and for a year after the chemotherapy. BEV is an antibody to a blood vessel growth factor, VEGF (Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor). The reason to test this combination would be to see whether or not better results are obtained from targeting cancer cells and their supporting blood vessels, rather than just the cancer cells alone. The different lengths of treatment with BEV would test whether it might work simply to increase the impact of the chemotherapy when given, or would have benefits by itself, in suppressing cancer re-growth.
The results showed there is some benefit to giving BEV during and after chemotherapy. There was an improvement in this group in the length of remission from the course of treatment, although this was fairly modest, at just about 4 months. Unfortunately, there wasn't a significant difference in the length of patient survival between groups. This might reflect the fact that luckily, there are many other treatments after first-line treatment, which might increase survival.
Chemotherapy plus Antibody to the Folate Receptor
Encouraging results of a smaller phase 2 studies were presented looking at the effects of farletuzumab (FTZ), an antibody to folate receptor alpha, which is over-produced in about 90% of ovarian cancers. The study had 2 treatment groups: women who had a first relapse of ovarian cancer arising 6-18 months after first-line chemotherapy and who were either having symptoms of cancer or no symptoms yet. The group without symptoms was given FTZ by itself, whereas the women with more symptomatic cancer were given chemotherapy in combination with FTZ. Half of the women had relapsed within only 6-12 months of prior treatment meaning their cancers were quite aggressive on average.
|
There were 58 women enrolled overall. Of the 25 women in the FTZ alone arm, results showed about three quarters had a decrease or stabilization in their CA125 marker for 3-6 months or longer. Of 44 women treated with chemo plus FTZ, 39 had Ca125 return to normal and 9 of those had a longer remission with FTZ+ chemo than they had obtained with first-line chemotherapy, which is unusual, as the length of remission tends to decrease over time in almost all patients who have relapsed. 3 of those 9 women have continued on to take FTZ by itself after the combination with remissions now lasting more than 3 years in some cases. These results though very notable, were seen in a select small group of women only thus a larger study is underway to assess the impact of FTZ with chemotherapy in first relapse.
PARP Inhibitor
Finally, another new class of drug, called a PARP inhibitor, was presented in a study by BC Cancer Agency's own Dr. Karen Gelmon. A number of PARP inhibitors are under study, and are of particular interest in women with inherited BRCA 1 or 2 mutations, which are known to cause a very high risk for breast and/or ovarian cancer. Researchers have anticipated the type of mutation present in the DNA of women with inherited mutations would make their tumors more vulnerable to a PARP inhibitor. The DNA changes in these women's cancers would likely make it harder for their cancer cells to repair damage caused by PARP inhibitors, or by PARP inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy.
This study tested an oral PARP inhibitor, olaparib, by itself, in women with breast or ovary cancer, which was either affecting women with identified inherited BRCA mutations, or women not yet assessed for the presence of an inherited mutation. There were 10 women with known mutations, and 54 with unknown status, in the ovary cancer group. In the small group with known BRCA mutation, 40% responded to olaparib and in the unknown group, 26% did. When BRCA testing was done on the unknown group, 7 of 54 were found to have inherited mutations. When women were then re-grouped according to having or not having a BRCA mutation, after testing, there was about a 41% response rate in the BRCA mutation group, and still about a 24% response rate, in the group without an inherited mutation. 14 women still remain on treatment on the study, continuing to do well on olaparib. These findings may indicate DNA changes in serous ovarian tumors are similar to those some women inherit, in high-risk families. This is being studied very closely.
Disappointingly, women with breast cancer who were either in association with a BRCA mutation, or were triple negative (a type of breast cancer more often seen in women with BRCA mutations) showed no significant benefits with olaparib in this study. 25 women with breast cancer were studied. The reasons for this lack of effect in breast cancer are not currently well understood.
|
|
Archived News Pages
|
| Spring 2010 Vol.1 No. 2 |
Antidepressants and Tamoxifen - What is the story?
|
Dr. Karen Gelmon, FRCPC, |
| Winter 2010 Volume 01 No.1 |
Breast cancer breakthrough in BC will help develop new breast cancer therapies
|
|
| Fall 2009 Vol. 10 No. 4 |
What's New in Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer?
|
Dr. Tanya Berrang, FRCPC |
| Summer 2009 Vol.10 No.3 |
No Home Runs at ASCO this year for Breast Cancer.
|
Dr. Karen Gelmon, FRCPC |
| Spring 2009 Vol.10 No. 2 |
Decisions Regarding Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer
|
Dr. Gary Pansegrau, FRCPC |
| Winter 2009 Vol.10 No.1 |
Decision Aid for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
|
Dr. Hannah Carolan, FRCPC |
| Fall 2008 Vol. 9 No. 4 |
I Am Taking My Medications - I Promise
|
Dr. Stephen Chia, FRCPC, Chair Breast Tumour Group |
| Summer 2008 Vol.9 No.3 |
News from Chicago
|
Dr. Hagen Kennecke, FRCPC |
| Spring 2008 Vol.9 No.2 |
Doctor, Why Aren't You Ordering Any Tests?
|
Dr. Stephen Chia MD, FRCP(C) |
| Winter 2008 Vol.9 No.1 |
Research Continues to Improve Knowledge and Care
|
Dr. Karen Gelmon, FRCPC, Chair, Provincial Breast Tumour Group |
| Fall 2007 Vol. 8 No. 4 |
Hormonal Therapy and Young Women
|
Dr. Karen Gelmon, MD, FRCPC, Chair, Breast Tumour Group |
| Summer 2007 Vol.8 No.3 |
Estrogen Matters
|
Dr. Karen Gelmon, MD. FRCPC |
| Spring 2007 Vol. 8 No. 2 |
Resistance to Therapy - Are Stem Cells a Reason?
|
Dr. Karen Gelmon, FRCPD |
| Winter 2007 Vol. 8 No.1 |
Answering Big Questions with Large Numbers
|
Dr. Karen Gelmon. FRCPC |
| Fall 2006 Vol. 6 No. 4 |
What are People Talking about when they ask me what my tumour marker is?
|
Dr. Karen Gelmon, MD, FRCPC |
| Summer 2006 Vol.7 No.3 |
The Environment and Breast Cancer
|
Dr. Karen Gelmon, MD. FRCPC |
| Spring 2006 Vol. 7 No. 2 |
It's a question of ... Research
|
Dr. Karen Gelmon, MD. FRCPC |
| Winter 2006 Vol. 7 No.1 |
New Results and future Directions
|
Dr. Karen Gelmon, MD, FRCPC |
| Fall 2005 Vol. 6 No. 4 |
The Recurring Theme
|
Dr. Karen Gelmon, MD, FRCPC |
| Summer 2005 Vol. 6 No. 3 |
Steps Ahead in Treating Breast Cancer - News from ASCO 2005
|
Dr. Karen Gelmon, MD, FRCPC |
| Spring 2005 Vol. 6 No. 2 |
Lost in Translation - Communicating about Cancer
|
Dr. Karen Gelmon, MD, FRCPC |
| Winter 2005 Vol. 6 No. 1 |
What about Estrogen Receptor Negative Disease?
|
Dr. Karen Gelmon MD, FRCPC |
| Fall 2004 Vol. 5 No. 4 |
Clinical Trials in Breast Cancer
|
Dr. Karen Gelmon, MD, FRCPC |
| Summer 2004 Vol. 5 No. 3 |
Musings: Post ASCO
|
Dr. Karen Gelmon, MD, FRCPC |
| Spring 2004 Vol.5 No. 2 |
Young Women and Breast Cancer
|
Dr. Karen Gelmon, MD, FRCPC |
| Winter 2004 Vol. 5 No.1 |
Blocking Estrogen
|
Dr. Karen Gelmon, MD, FRCPC |
| Fall 2003 Vol.4 No.4 |
Oncological Aspects of Reconstructive Surgery
|
Dr. Karen Gelmon, MD, FRCPC |
| Summer 2003 Vol.4 No.3 |
Promising ASCO Research Results
|
Dr. Karen Gelmon, MD, FRCPC |
| Spring 2003 Vol.4 No.2 |
Why is my Treatment Different from Hers?
|
Dr. Karen Gelmon, MD, FRCPC |
| Winter 2003 Vol.4. No.1 |
Hormones and Breast Cancer
|
Dr. Karen Gelmon, MD, FRCPC |
| Fall 2002 Vol.3 No.4 |
Recurrence - What we all fear.
|
Dr. Karen Gelmon, MD, FRCPC |
| Summer 2002 Vol.3 No.3 |
Pregnancy and Breast Cancer
|
Dr. Karen Gelmon, MD, FRCPC |
| Spring 2002 Vol.3 No.2 |
Breast Cancer - What genes may tell us
|
Dr. Karen Gelmon, MD, FRCPC |
| Winter 2002 Vol.3. No.1 |
Can we detect cancers?
|
Dr. Karen Gelmon, MD, FRCPC |
| Fall 2001 Vol.2 No.4 |
Medical Dramas in the Media
|
Dr. Karen Gelmon MD, FRCPC |
| Summer 2001 Vol.2 No.3 |
New Hormonal Agents for Breast Cancer
|
Dr. Karen Gelmon MD, FRCPC |
| Spring 2001 Vol.2 No.2 |
What Causes Breast Cancer?
|
Dr. Karen Gelmon MD, FRCPC |
| Winter 2001 Vol.2 No.1 |
Screening Mammography: The Debate
|
Dr. Karen Gelmon MD, FRCPC |
| Fall 2000 Vol.1 No.4 |
Sentinel Node Biopsy - Pet Scanning: What Are They?
|
Dr. Karen Gelmon MD, FRCPC |
| Summer 2000 Vol.1 No.3 |
Putting Fatigue to Bed!
|
Dr. Karen Gelmon MD, FRCPC |
| Spring 2000 Vol.1 No.2 |
Pitfalls of Clinical Trials
|
Dr. Karen Gelmon MD, FRCPC |
| Winter 2000 Vol.1 No.1 |
Information Sifting
|
Dr. Karen Gelmon MD, FRCPC |
|
Home |
Feature |
Medical News |
Healthy Living |
Journeys |
Insight |
Hot Flashes |
Complementary Corner
What's Going On |
Resource Guide |
Sponsors |
Contact Info |
|